| |
Bissinger
Philosophical Essay Competition
The
Bissinger Philosophical Essay Competition is named for Mildred Bissinger,
a Washington State University graduate who generously bequeathed
funds to the Philosophy Department and to other departments in the
University.
First
held in the fall of 2000, the contest annually awards a cash prize
of $500 for the best essay by a Washington State University undergraduate
student on a topic chosen by the philosophy faculty.
Criteria
for selection include thematic focus, skill in argumentation, clarity,
originality, and precision and style in writing. Evidence of familiarity
with traditional or contemporary philosophical thinking pertinent
to the question may be a plus but is not always necessary. Decisions
are made by a blind review conducted by the Scholarship Committee
of the Department of Philosophy.
Questions
about the competition may be addressed to the Department of Philosophy,
335-8611 or philo@wsu.edu.
The
competition is sponsored by the Department of Philosophy to encourage
philosophical thought and excellence of writing at Washington State
University. The competition is open to any undergraduate student
at Washington State University who has taken, or is currently enrolled
in, at least one philosophy course.
Entries
are limited to 1,000 words and should be typed, double-spaced,
with student's name, WSU ID number, address, and telephone number
(or e-mail address) on a cover page but not on the text itself,
so as to allow for blind reviewing.

Due: March 28, 2008
Eighth Annual Bissinger Philosophical
Essay Competition
Cash prize of $500
for the
best essay by a WSU undergraduate
student addressing the question:
In An Introduction to Metaphysics, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger argues that religion, since it presumes to have absolute answers to the "ultimate" questions of existence and the cosmos, is fundamentally at odds with philosophy. Do you agree that a philosopher cannot be religious?
The
competition is sponsored by the Department of Philosophy to encourage
philosophical thought and excellence of writing at Washington State
University. The competition is open to any undergraduate student
at WSU who has taken, or is currently enrolled in, at least one
philosophy course.
Entries
are limited to one thousand words and should be typed, double-spaced,
with student's name, WSU ID number, address and telephone number
(or e-mail address) on a cover page but not on the text itself,
so as to allow for blind reviewing.
Criteria
for selection include thematic focus, skill in argumentation, clarity,
originality, and precision and style in writing. Evidence of familiarity
with traditional or contemporary philosophical thinking pertinent
to the question may be a plus but is not always necessary. Decisions
will be made by the Scholarship Committee of the Department of Philosophy,
which reserves the right to award no prize if in any year no entries
are judged to be of sufficient merit.
Entries
are due in the Department of Philosophy, Bryan Hall 316, by
March 28th, with the winner announced shortly after that. Questions
about the competition itself may be addressed to the Department
of Philosophy, 335-8611 or philo@wsu.edu.
| Year |
Topic |
Winner(s) |
| 2008 |
In An Introduction to Metaphysics, the German philosopher Martin Heidegger argues that religion, since it presumes to have absolute answers to the "ultimate" questions of existence and the cosmos, is fundamentally at odds with philosophy. Do you agree that a philosopher cannot be religious? |
No award given |
| 2007 |
Is
it an essential feature of a philosophical question that
it be unanswerable? If
so, why? If
not, why are so many philosophical questions unanswered? |
DeAnn
Gerlick |
| 2005 |
Socrates
famously said that an unexamined life is not worth living.
What constitutes an examined life? Was Socrates right that
such a life is better?
Why or why not? |
No
award given |
| 2004 |
When did
time begin? |
James
Swenson |
| 2003 |
The
film Minority Report (Spielberg, 2002) supposes a future world
where criminals are caught and incarcerated before they have
a chance to commit their crimes. If we had reliable knowledge
of what people were going to do, would we be justified in holding
them morally and legally responsible now for future bad actions,
actions which they have not yet committed -- and which, if we
incarcerate them now, they never will commit? |
Chris
Findeisen |
| 2002 |
What
is the difference between knowledge and wisdom? |
Honorable
Mention Awards: Jafar Fallahi & Kenny Pearce |
| 2001 |
Could
a human-constructed artifact ever be conscious? |
Aaron
Hayes
Jason Turner
(tied) |
| 2000 |
Given
a choice between a pill which would make you wise and a pill
which would make you happy, which would you choose, and why? |
Jason
Turner |
|
|
|
|